In the meantime, check out this story: the biggest thing to hit fishing since....well, since ever!!
Batman #233
The Other Bruce Wayne: The man for whom Bruce Wayne was named, his cousin Bruce Wayne, visits Gotham and stays at Wayne Manor. As fate would have it, Bruce is a world-famous detective who begins to suspect that there is more to Bruce than meets the eye! Bruce must work the same case as Bruce without letting Bruce stumble upon proof that he, Bruce, is truly the Dark Knight Detective. What will Bruce do????
What's this? Commissioner Gordon threatening to suspend Batman?? Ah Commish - look how crestfallen the big lug looks as you are reprimanding him. Can't you give him just one more chance??Bruce Wayne's Aunt Agatha: Bruce's elderly Aunt visits Wayne Manor and in almost no time does what the visiting world-famous detective Bruce Wayne couldn't do: discovers Bruce and Dick in their Batman and Robin costumes! Luckily, she is far too feeble-minded to truly understand the implications of what she is seeing, and through some of comicdom's most ridiculous twists and turns, she ends up disguised as the Joker, rescuing Batman and Robin from certain death at the hands of organized crime. At no point does she even suspect that Bruce truly is Batman! Ridiculous!

The Crime of Bruce Wayne: I can barely keep this up after suffering through that last one. In a nutshell, Commissioner Gordon asks private citizen Bruce Wayne to go undercover in Gotham prison for him and without hesitation, the millionaire accepts. He is convicted of being the masked criminal The Collector and sent to jail, where the other inmates frame him for murder. The wheels of justice spin quickly and in a few day's time, Bruce is on Death Row awaiting execution. He pleads with the Warden to check with the Commissioner to verify his story, but unfortunately Gordon has spent the last few days in a coma following a nasty car crash. Because of this, Robin teams up with Batwoman to prove Bruce's innocence. Everything is wrapped up neatly by the end, except for the fate of the poor Commish. No mention is ever made of his condition, but it doesn't matter because our hero is out of jail! Go Bruce!!
What does Brian think?
As he investigates, Batman find many suspects. The "straights" in town immediately finger the two hippies, Shecky and Jamie, simply because they are different; however, their teacher, Miss Antrim, assures Batman that the boys wouldn't blow up buildings. The Dark Knight Detective takes an interest in Barney, the gossiping mailman who believes in the curse and is "yearning for a place in the sun." There is also an outspoken real estate dealer named Congreve who would benefit from the publicity of the curse coming true. So many possibilities!
The story wraps up as Batman and Miss Antrim lecture the town on how ignorance and superstition caused a tragedy both years ago with Ol' Nell and today when the stuffed-shirts lashed out at hippies just because they were "different."
Brown and Giordano do a serviceable job with the art, but if you compare it to what Neal Adams was doing just a month earlier in Batman's "Daughter Of The Demon" story, you can see this is a step backwards from Swartz's "New Look" Batman. The sleek, modern sheen is nowhere to be found. Having said that, the book doesn't look terrible, just old-fashioned.
Later, Batman survives a fall from the top of the town's bell-tower, not through any acrobatic skill or well-practiced use of his bat rope, but because EVERY TIME he is at the top of a tall structure, he subtly ties one end of a rope around his ankle and the other end around some sort of support. All I can say is that it was a good thing his rope wasn't even a foot longer or he would have broken his neck!
I'm not going to say too much more because I'm a firm believer that if I could write these stories better, I'd be doing it, and obviously I'm not. Also, I'm sure part of the problem with this tale is the simple passing of time. Having said that, I'm sure that some of the kids' dialogue rang false the very month the book hit the stands. Allow me to share a few panels that made me chuckle aloud, and we'll leave it at that. Not every issue can be a classic!
(What does that even mean? "An official upstate mission." I guess not all of Batman's missions are "official." Or maybe for this one night he was working for the state government? Weird - to say nothing of the policeman's declaration of desire!)
(The world's greatest detective in action. That inspires confidence - he doesn't notice a body until he slips his foot into it.)
What does Brian think?
Only two months after my birth, O'Neil and Adams strike with the first bona fide Batman classic of my lifetime!
I am only able to review the title Batman in uninterrupted order here because my Detective Comics collection doesn't go back quite as far. While I have every issue of Batman since April 1971, I only have MOST issues of Detective from the same time frame. Because of this, I couldn't cover the introduction of Talia al Ghul in May's Detective Comics, but this issue of Batman is a far more important landmark.
Ra's goes on to become one of Batman's most important villains, trying to save the world from destruction by ridding it of humanity. The highlight of his career undoubtedly was his appearance in the film Batman Begins, with the very talented Liam Neeson playing the role. Here in Batman #232, Neal Adams attempted to tell us a lot about the character through his illustrations, as he explains in TwoMorrow's excellent book, The Batcave Companion:
People draw Ra's al Ghul with eyebrows. Ra's al Ghul has no eyebrows. I like that because that meant that something happened in his life that removed his eyebrows. It doesn't bother him at all. It's part of him....Have his hair recede because he's been around and experienced life. He should be sort of Middle-Eastern...but not with a beard...give him something interesting as facial hair. And see what happens when all those pieces are put together. Does it become somebody original? Wow, it did.
Not only did Adams succeed in creating a visually-striking enemy for the Caped Crusader, he turned in one of his greatest issues ever in terms of iconic images. Paging through this issue, virtually every page has some sort of treat for your eyes. It is a tremendous illustration of why he was important to the development of the art form in the 1970s.
The only aspect of the story that I question is the recap of Batman's origin on pages six and seven. It doesn't hurt the story, but the lead-in to it pulls you out of the book with its awkwardness. Having said that, it is a treat to see Adams' version of some of the artwork from Batman #1.
In The Batcave Companion, O'Neil mentions that the retelling of Batman's beginning wasn't originally in his script. Adams had simply wanted to draw it, so he did! It wasn't until he saw the penciled pages that O'Neil even knew what Adams had done. O'Neil says that it doesn't hurt the story at all, and I agree; I just find it a bit jarring. Another interesting tidbit revealed by O'Neil in TwoMorrow's interview is that it was editor Julie Swartz who came up with the name Ra's al Ghul. He suggested it to Denny and told him to run with it, having come up with nothing beyond the interesting sobriquet himself.
As Robin was part of the main story this time around, there was no back-up feature detailing his adventures at Hudson University.
Anything else to say?
Another famous name shows up in the letter column this month. The aforementioned Mike W. Barr, who would himself pen many memorable Ra's al Ghul tales, comments on Batman #229 and is shocked to find himself unable to complain about much. Barr wrote an underrated al Ghul story with underrated artist Trevor Von Eeden for 1982's Batman Annual and created the series Batman and the Outsiders.

What does Brian think?
The entire segment with Reardon secretly using his ten eyes to get the job of air marshal was very entertaining. It displayed both fun and originality, which the rest of the tale lacked. Without this scene, the story becomes just another “man hunting his fellow man” adventure, which has been done over and over in literature and film. I’m not certain how safe the whole “gun battle in a plane” that earned Reardon his job was, but as a reader I accepted it.
The story’s visuals were excellent. While he never seemed to become a fan-favorite like some of his peers, I have always enjoyed the pencil work of Irv Novick. This most likely stems from my enjoyment of his early 1980’s run on Batman with writer Len Wein. As a youngster, I found their pairing to result in some of the most exciting stories on the newsstand, and I believe it was the first I became aware of Novick’s work. And while Frank Robbins is no Len Wein when it comes to Batman, this is still an enjoyable tale with a bit of excitement thrown in for good measure. Plus you finally get to see what the key to the Batplane looks like!! What more could you ask for for fifteen cents??
This Robin adventure was scripted by Mike Friedrich, who I believe was about Dick Grayson’s age when DC hired him to write the Robin back-up feature. He does a relatively good job making the dialogue ring true to the reader. I think the problem with the story is the triteness of the plot. Robin isn’t the most fantastic hero in DC’s stable, but readers would like to see him tackle more than a handful of frat boys. I understand the atmosphere of realism that Friedrich is going for with Dick’s angst and the campus robberies; it’s just a bit boring compared to Robin’s past run-ins with Gotham’s colorful rogues.
Overall, I would say that Batman’s back-up, Robin, was far more worthwhile than last month’s Detective Comics back-up with Batgirl. While I don’t find myself curious to know what Dick Grayson’s next college- adventure will be, at least I’m not mad at myself for taking the time to read the story. That doesn’t sound like high praise, but I think that May 1971 was a pretty solid month for Batman.
Detective Comics #410
Flippy, the young boy whose curse is to be half-human, half-seal, is a striking figure. The condition seems too fantastic to have ever been true, yet the character works so well in the story that you never question it.
While the story doesn't contain any examples of Adams at his iconic best, it's still a shining example of what makes him such a great artist. He is so effective at establishing atmosphere and depicting action through his pencils. Few were working on his level at this time.
O'Neil continues the trend of the narrator directly addressing the reader, something I think Swartz encouraged in Detective Comics. The fifth panel on page nine reads: "Some time in the past ten minutes, the Batman made an important observation -- two, in fact! Have you?"
Barbara "Batgirl" Gordon is caught up in the intrigue when Mamies personal couturier comes to the Gotham library to research Medieval costumes. As fate would have it, Ms. Gordon works as the head librarian when she's not out fighting crime, so Batgirl, unlike the rest of the curious population, can cross "mini-skirts" off the list as they didn't exist in Medieval times. This is information that a curious (and pushy) representative of the mini-manufacturers tries to get from Barbara, offering her one hundred dollars just for a glimpse of the book's title, but she refuses, citing the rule that all books must be checked back in to the library before they can be loaned out again.
Batgirl ends up at his factory, spies him being threatened by the mob, and swoops in to save him, ignoring his high sleaze factor. Along the way, she makes an attempt to chastise the business men for taking advantage of the fairer sex; however, even with this vicious tongue-lashing, Batgirl is overpowered. As the story ends, the Caped Crusader is strapped to a table as the criminals discuss killing her with something that looks like a price-gun.
What does Brian think?
Anyway, I haven't managed to find the next issue yet, so I can't tell you how Batgirl escapes from the death-trap. I hope you won't be too upset by that and that you will return in a few days to see how things went for Batman in May of 1971 as he faces off against "The Man Who Saw With His Fingers."
Please note that in early 1971, the actual book called Batman was published bi-monthly, and there was no issue published in April, the month of my birth. Luckily I had this issue of Detective to kick off the blog.